The Communist Party of China Central Committee and the nation’s State Council have outlined a direction for further regulation of its tech industry – and indeed the nation as a whole.
A Implementation scheme for building a government of law, published in full in the state-controlled body Xinhua proposes the formulation by which the Chinese Communist Party intends to govern by 2025.
Technology-related plans include promoting technological innovation, using digital technology to expand channels for public participation in law-making, integrating government decision-making with government AI and Big Data and Improving Law Enforcement Using Information Technology.
The document also calls for electronic identity authentication and the use of electronic certificates and seals, in part to aid in the delivery of government services.
The paper also calls for a review of antitrust laws and research on China’s digital economy, as well as the areas of internet finance, AI, big data and cloud computing. This research should “fill the gaps and ensure the healthy development of new forms of business and new models with good laws and good governance.”
It’s anything but an admission that the big Chinese tech companies have beaten local laws. Beijing has cracked down on Ant Group’s financial ambitions and held back the activities of other web giants – for reasons ranging from monopoly tendencies to bribing young people with computer games, offering dirty apps, loose data security, allowing offshore entities to access the personal data of Chinese citizens. , and even inappropriate karaoke.
The Council and the Committee also call for the improvement of the inspection capacities of the government, to ensure that Beijing stays abreast of the activities of the organizations.
The final point of the document is that China needs better “public opinion propaganda” and research institutions that educate the public on how the nation is governed.
This apparently guarantees the success of the policies described in the document – however effective they may be. ®